Value stream map
Where does the time actually go?
SupplierStores cage
- Record the promiseHelen WardC/T n/a
- Release the lotMara EllisonC/T n/a
- Issue the materialAndre PellC/T n/a
- 11 h queueMachine the seat faceDevon ChoC/T 46 min
- Inspect the seatPriya ShahC/T n/a
- Kit and packLuis OrtegaC/T n/a
- 16 h lagConfirm the shipmentLuis OrtegaC/T n/a
CustomerHartwell Process Equipment18 bodiesTakt 25 min
Touch 46 minWait 11 h before the cell and 16 h after the truck
How this sheet sits with the others
Almost all of the lead time is wait. The median queue before machining is 11 hours, and the posted touch time is 46 minutes, which is already over the 25-minute takt. The revision that lives in email, and the 16-hour lag from truck to Ledgerline, are delays in the record rather than in the metal. No touch or wait is stated for the other steps.
- What it makes visible
- Touch, wait, and where the record lives, including the delays in the record itself.
- When it is useful
- When the argument is about lead time rather than about who moves the lot.
- Who uses it
- Mara Ellison sees the queue. Devon Cho sees the touch time. Luis Ortega sees the confirm lag.
- What it takes
- The seven steps, and the times already known for queue, touch, and confirm lag.
- What it leaves
- Machining marked because 46 minutes of touch sits under 11 hours of queue, and because 46 is already over the 25-minute takt. The email revision and the 16-hour confirm lag marked as information delay.
- The underlying record
- Touch and wait on those same seven steps, the queue under Devon Cho's seat-face work, the revision that stays in email, and the lag from the dock back to Ledgerline are the time the path sheets share.
Where these facts go next
What this sheet still leaves out
It has no cause and no specification.