Check sheet
What did people actually mark, and where?
28 Sep–2 Oct. A bench sample, not the Pareto total.
| Where | Defect | Marks | Count |
|---|---|---|---|
| traveler header | wrong rev | 2 marks | 2 |
| vise jaw | scratch | 9 marks | 9 |
| pack bench | missing seal | 2 marks | 2 |
| dock inbox | confirm on the wrong day | 4 marks | 4 |
How this sheet sits with the others
This is the bench sample for 28 Sep–2 Oct, not the Pareto total. Two traveler headers were marked wrong rev. Nine scratches were marked at the vise jaw. Two missing seals were marked at the pack bench. Four confirms were marked in the dock inbox on the wrong day. The sheet says where the marks were made. It does not show a trend or a spec.
- What it makes visible
- The marks from the bench sample of 28 Sep–2 Oct, by place and by defect.
- When it is useful
- When a longer count needs to be tied to a place someone can walk to.
- Who uses it
- Priya Shah’s bench, the pack bench, and Luis Ortega’s dock inbox.
- What it takes
- Marks made in that sample window, not the twelve-week totals.
- What it leaves
- Traveler header, wrong rev, 2. Vise jaw, scratch, 9. Pack bench, missing seal, 2. Dock inbox, confirm on the wrong day, 4.
- The underlying record
- Marks at the traveler header, the vise jaw, the pack bench, and the dock inbox are the bench sample behind the longer defect count, the reject chart, and the failure rows.
Where these facts go next
What this sheet still leaves out
It has no trend and no specification.